<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fabulous 00s: Curing the GGGg Debacle at the US Amateur Team East 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/</link>
	<description>Chess History, Opening Theory, and Anecdotes by Dr. Mark Ginsburg</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nezhmet</title>
		<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>nezhmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-586</guid>
		<description>A lot of people concur with the "Reich position."  Let me make an analogy to hopefully illustrate the drawbacks.  An amateur basketball tournament is organized (4 on 4 half court).  For decades, amateur basketball players loved to get out there and play their imperfect game and battle it out for the unimportant trophy.  Then a team shows up with 3 NBA starters and a toddler that they place out of the way 40 feet from the basket.  The 3 NBA starters win the event quite easily and the toddler goes home with the trophy.  The starters were paid by the toddler's dad. Did this promote basketball or just make a mockery of the event?

How to fix this?  By the &lt;strong&gt;Competency Criterion&lt;/strong&gt;:  the toddler must be able to sink one free-throw in ten attempts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people concur with the &#8220;Reich position.&#8221;  Let me make an analogy to hopefully illustrate the drawbacks.  An amateur basketball tournament is organized (4 on 4 half court).  For decades, amateur basketball players loved to get out there and play their imperfect game and battle it out for the unimportant trophy.  Then a team shows up with 3 NBA starters and a toddler that they place out of the way 40 feet from the basket.  The 3 NBA starters win the event quite easily and the toddler goes home with the trophy.  The starters were paid by the toddler&#8217;s dad. Did this promote basketball or just make a mockery of the event?</p>
<p>How to fix this?  By the <strong>Competency Criterion</strong>:  the toddler must be able to sink one free-throw in ten attempts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Reich</title>
		<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-573</guid>
		<description>If someone wants to give titled players a payday, and class players an opportunity to play them, why complain?  There are no money prizes on the line.  If I were lucky enough to be on a regional winning team (close 1 year), I would be thrilled to play a GM one on one in the playoffs.  The stacked teams help promote chess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone wants to give titled players a payday, and class players an opportunity to play them, why complain?  There are no money prizes on the line.  If I were lucky enough to be on a regional winning team (close 1 year), I would be thrilled to play a GM one on one in the playoffs.  The stacked teams help promote chess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomo</title>
		<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>randomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-560</guid>
		<description>For the sake of simplicity, I just prefer the 1,000-point rule.

Regarding the Barclay Gallery: they also fielded two teams in 1985. Both of them were 5-0 going into the last round. We beat one team and out-tiebreaked the other one (since its 4th board went 0-6). Double whammy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of simplicity, I just prefer the 1,000-point rule.</p>
<p>Regarding the Barclay Gallery: they also fielded two teams in 1985. Both of them were 5-0 going into the last round. We beat one team and out-tiebreaked the other one (since its 4th board went 0-6). Double whammy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-557</guid>
		<description>I like the idea that board 4 has to score a point.  Though it needs to be a played game point.  Fanning did score a forfeit win.  Was that someone who decided it was better to forfeit then waste 10 minutes playing a 5 year old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea that board 4 has to score a point.  Though it needs to be a played game point.  Fanning did score a forfeit win.  Was that someone who decided it was better to forfeit then waste 10 minutes playing a 5 year old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granny O'Doul</title>
		<link>http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/the-fabulous-00s-fixing-the-poopy-gggg-problem-at-the-us-amateur-team/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Granny O'Doul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nezhmet.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-554</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly (a rhetorical device, intended to strike a modest note. In fact, I'm absolutely certain), Whitehead beat Rachels in '84 to save a drawn match for the uptown yayo though of course the Kids were the tiebreak champs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly (a rhetorical device, intended to strike a modest note. In fact, I&#8217;m absolutely certain), Whitehead beat Rachels in &#8216;84 to save a drawn match for the uptown yayo though of course the Kids were the tiebreak champs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
