Black Can Play Better in the 2 Knights!
Recently some games have appeared in the 2 Knights – they all share the same characteristic that a principal move for black is not mentioned!
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5!? The venerable, if somewhat time-wasting and primitive, attack on f7.
4….d5 5. exd5 Na5! The only good move. Friedel has had some good results with the crazy Ulvestad lunge 5….b5?! but that looks unsound.
6. Bb5+ c6 7. dxc6 bxc6 8. Bd3!?
Obviously self-blocking but white does have an extra pawn. This is how Nakamura suprised Friedel in the competitively important last round of the US Championship last year.
8…Ng4! The best move! Not played or MENTIONED in any of the recent games that have graced the virtual pages of Chess Life Online!
Why is it systematically ignored by: Nakamura (in his notes to the Friedel game), Friedel (in HIS notes to the Nakamura game) and Molner and others in the Molner-Mitkov NAO 10 game? The move 8….Ng4! has history on its side. It was tried out by none other than…. OK readers look it up! Friedel played some slow Be7 and O-O and just lost due to white’s extra pawn. Mitkov played 8….h6 and ….Nd5 and gained some activity but in the end Molner had, well, superior activity and the extra pawn. I am baffled why it went without passing in ANY of the recent games’ annotations.
Stay tuned, I will post here further analysis on 8…Ng4!. It has the distinct advantage of forcing white into passive situations, often with a compromised pawn structure.