In “Thoughts from a Bionic Lime“,a strange prediction is made in Baltimore-Chicago.
Here are the lineups.
|Baltimore Kingfishers||Chicago Blaze|
|FM Tegshsuren Enkhbat: 2446||FM Florin Felecan: 2449|
|IM Larry Kaufman: 2424||IM Emory Tate: 2392|
|FM Ray Kaufman: 2348||FM Mehmed Pasalic: 2375|
|NM Aaron Kahn: 2291||IM Angelo Young: 2356|
|Avg Rating: 2377||Avg Rating: 2393|
The Lime says BALTIMORE vs CHICAGO
I think its a bit early in the semester for Erenburg to be having midterms, so its a shame that he’s not on Board 1. Chicago pulls out a solid lineup and will burn the feathers off the birds.
Prediction: Baltimore 0.5 – 3.5 Chicago
That is an unlikely outcome. Look for Baltimore to at least double or triple their predicted output.
Then the Lime gets too citrus-y in Miami-Dallas.
|FM Bruci Lopez: 2486||GM Jaan Ehlvest: 2668|
|IM Blas Lugo: 2393||IM Ron Burnett: 2412|
|FM Osmany Perea: 2453||FM Peter Bereolos: 2304|
|NM Eric Rodriguez: 2242||FM John Bick: 2249|
|Avg Rating: 2394
||Avg Rating: 2408|
Quoth the Lime, MIAMI vs TENNESSEE (Monday)
Miami throws up their B-line up (B = Becerra-less) against the Tempo, probably assuming the Ehlvest wouldn’t play again. Wrong. The Tempo will pacify the Sharks like a Discovery Channel producer with a tranquilizer gun.
Prediction: Miami 1.5 – 2.5 Tennessee
A. Miami made no such assumption
B. Their 3rd board is a moose (granted, this is a late lineup change that might have gone under the Lime’s radar)
C. Their 1st board is under-rated at this time control – Lime puts too much credence on static ratings.
Look for the Sharks to exceed expectations.
Miami vs Tennessee: Narrowly Avoiding a Shark Bite
Here is GM Jaan Ehlvest’s second win in a row. But as we will see, it didn’t go so swimmingly vs. the Shark.
Bruci Lopez (MIA) – Jaan Ehlvest (TEN) Gurgenidze System
1. e4 g6 2. d4 d6 3. Nc3 c6 4. f4 d5 Needless to say, it’s a little bizarre for black to play 2…d6 and then 4…d5.
5. e5 h5 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. Be3 e6 8. h3 Bxf3 9. Qxf3 h4 10. Bd3 Nh6 11. O-O Nf5 12. Bf2 Nd7 13. Ne2 a5 14. b3 Ba3 15. c4 Kf8 16. Rab1 Kg7 17. Rfd1 Be7 18. Rdc1 Nb8 19. Kh2 Na6 20. Bxf5 exf5 Strange, 20…gxf5 is tidier. 21. Nc3 Nc7 22. cxd5 cxd5 To give black this lonely d-pawn is a big accomplishment for white. 23. Na4 Ra6 24. Nc5 Ra7 25. Rc2 b6 26. Na4 Ne6 So far white has conducted the game very well whereas black has made some strange moves.
Position after 26…Ne6. The Shark misses the Bite.
27. Rbc1? Here is a move I bet white would like to try again. The obvious 27.Rc6! b5 (27… Rb7 28. Rbc1 Ba3 (too late for this now!) 29. R1c2 Bb4 30. Nc3 Bxc3 31. R2xc3 Rd7 and black is groveling for a half point; white has a big edge) 28. Nc5 Bxc5 29. dxc5 Rc7 30. Rd6 Qa8 31. Rc1 and white is crushing.
27… Ba3 28. Rc8 The mistaken idea that accounts for white’s 27th.
28…Bxc1! Of course! White winds up paralyzed.
29. Rxd8 Bxf4+30. Kg1 Rxd8 31. Bxh4 Rc8 32. Bf6+ Kh7 33. Nc3 Rac7 34. Ne2 Rc1+! 35. Nxc1 Rxc1+ 36. Kf2
Position after 36. Kf2. Black to play and win.
36…Bh2? At the threshhold of of victory, a serious mistake. The pleasing geometric 36… Bd2! wraps it up. If 37. Qd3 (the toughest is 37. g3 Be1+ 38. Kf1 Bxg3+ 39. Kg2 Be1 40. Qf1 Bd2 41. Qf2 Rd1 42. Qf3 Re1 43. Be7 Re4 44. Qg3 Nf4+ 45. Kh1 Re3 but black still wins) 37… Be1+ 38. Kf3 Rc3 and wins.
37. g4! Nf4 38. gxf5 gxf5 39. Bg5? Losing. White can save it unexpectedly with 39. Bd8! hitting b6. For example, the game-idea 39…Bg1+ 40. Kg3 Rc3 doesn’t get the full point because white achieves a classic domination of the bishop over the knight in the liquidation sequence. After 41. Qxc3 Ne2+ 42. Kg2 Nxc3 43. Kxg1 Nxa2 44. Bxb6 Nc1 45. Bxa5 Ne2+ 46. Kf2 Nxd4 47. Bb6 Nxb3 48. Ke2 and it’s a draw.
39… Bg1+ 40. Kg3 Rc3 Now black wins. 41. Bxf4 Bxd4 42. Qxc3 Bxc3 43. a4 Kg6 44. Kf3 Bd4 45. Bg3 Bc5 46. Bf4 Kh5 47. Bg3 Kg5 48. h4+ Kg6 49. Kf4 d4 50. Bf2 d3 51. Be3 Bxe3+ 0-1
Search Engine Terms
These terms were used to find my site.
|icc smith morra||1|
|eugene meyer chess||1|
|dutch leningrad 2008||1|
|chess black white history||1|
|horrible senior portraits||2|
|chess rauser yugoslav||2|
|old indian defence chess||1|
|stephen a. feinberg||1|
Items and Activities Seen in Other Blogs
Approved: Jack Daniels
Disapproved: toenail biting